Adam Smith, David Ricardo and Thomas Malthus?

Dear Dr. Chomsky:
Some time ago, you got me looking at Adam Smith. This quickly led me to David Ricardo's "wage floor," which appears to be the basis of the conflict between the Democrats (Marxists or Neo-Marxists), Republicans (National Socialists) and Libertarians (Milton Friedman Free Marketers).
This opened the door to Thomas Malthus, who makes the passive case for the overthrow of the U. S. Constitution in his observation that 'liberty' (which happens to by guaranteed in the U. S. Constitution) lays the foundation for increased child births in an overpopulated world.
Marx opposed Malthus as bourgeois.
I'm curious how the central bankers seem to have gone beyond Marx. Is this Neo-Marxism?
Marx writes as if he is simply protecting the proletariat, and that the central bank is just a passing part of the "Manifesto." Was Marx really third cousins to the Rochild Banking Cartel?
Was Marx duped by the Rochilds into manipulating populations under the control of the Rothchilds?
Most respectfully,


Gene K. Chapman

Popular posts from this blog

Adult Diaper Exeriment